|
Edited by rodolfo at 2016-4-27 08:36
@zhao_steven @phelum
Thanks for answering. Let me assure you that OPI boards could be very successful if they would simply deliver quality at a competitive price. There are too many boards with similar specs, soon obsoleted by missing support for exotic added components..
The real news would be FEWER, but SIMPLE ROBUST QUALITY BOARDS with support and availability. I mentioned three classes of boards before ( simple entry low power / universal medium specs / high end with fast interfaces ). If such boards would exist in a working condition with working mainstream kernel/drivers/libraries - the community could focus on actual high level use cases ( how to use OPIs in schools, businesses, IoT, home servers, robotics...)
It was extremely tedious to turn OPI ONE into a useful board. Without sunxi / Armbian and members of this board ( Openelec ) it would not have been possible. The sorry state of support is not so much a problem for hardcore tinkerers and low level experts, they always find a way to turn a heap of parts into some useful gadget. The real problem is with ordinary users who are quite savvy at solving real life use cases, but simply expect the boards to be in more than alpha stage when it comes to OS/drivers/libraries. These users are put off by non-working components and mismatched software.
Have a nice day. |
|